mersiowsky - 10-6-2016 at 11:07 AM
Lětopis Abstract 2012 2: Werner, Eduard: How Sorbian is the Townsmen’s Oath of Bautzen?
The Townsmen’s Oath of Bautzen has traditionally been regarded as the oldest attestation of Upper Sorbian. However, it contains many phonological and
morphological features which are hardly compatible with Upper Sorbian. Schuster-Šewc’s explanation assumes extensive Czech and Lower Sorbian
influence; he claims that the writer was either a Lower Sorb who could not tell the difference between his native Lower Sorbian dialect and Upper
Sorbian or a Czech who knew both and therefore mixed Lower Sorbian words into the Upper Sorbian text. Neither suggestion is fully convincing.
If we divide the linguistic features of the text into those which must be Czech, Upper Sorbian and Lower Sorbian we do not find any which require us
to assume Lower Sorbian influence and only very few (and then exclusively phonetic ones) which point towards Upper Sorbian. Therefore, we interpret
the attestation as a Czech oath which has been rewritten by an Upper Sorb who substituted the Czech [ř] and [ť], not found
in Upper Sorbian, with the corresponding Upper Sorbian reflexes [š] and [č]. Then, the same text was rewritten by a German who
did not know Sorbian (probably the same individual who gave the text its German title) and who had therefore difficulties distinguishing the
orthographically similar <cz> and <y>.
Thus, using the analogy of the Church Slavonic recensions we could speak of an Upper Sorbian recension of a Czech attestation.
More Information Here:
webmaster - 2-3-2017 at 01:10 AM
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=25866